On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Pedro Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > (not a complete review) > > On 02/27/2013 02:17 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > >> +if test "x$with_babeltrace" != "xno"; then >> + saved_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" >> + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $btinc" >> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for babeltrace]) >> + AC_TRY_COMPILE([ >> +#include <babeltrace/babeltrace.h> >> +#include <babeltrace/ctf/events.h> >> +#include <babeltrace/ctf/iterator.h> > > We know from previous patches that the latest released > babeltrace breaks gdb, due to the lookup_enum function. Does > this catch that? I see namespacing fixes going into > babeltrace as recently as last 15th. Do we know if > babeltrace's API is more or less done and close to a release?
Hi Mathieu, Could you help us with this question? Thanks, Hui > >> + ],[], >> + [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]); AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBBABELTRACE, 1, [Define if >> libbabeltrace is available])], >> + [AC_MSG_RESULT([no]); btlibs= ; btinc= ]) >> + CFLAGS="$saved_CFLAGS" >> +fi >> + >> +# Flags needed for UST > > babeltrace > >> +AC_SUBST(btlibs) >> +AC_SUBST(btinc) >> + > > -- > Pedro Alves > _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
