Mariadb+LTTng2.x is now working. Let me know if you all know any java benchmark to test it?
Yang ________________________________________ From: Mathieu Desnoyers [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:54 AM To: Yang Wang Cc: Alexandre Montplaisir; Yannick Brosseau; David Goulet; Graeme Johnson; Kenneth Kent; [email protected] Subject: Re: Mariadb+LTTng 2.x Ensure that you don't have a old sessiond binary still running, that you issue ldconfig as root, that you don't have stale old libs in /usr/lib nor /usr/local/lib Thanks, Mathieu * Yang Wang ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello Alex, > > I reinstalled lttng-tools-2.1.0 and compiled Mariadb with lttng-ust.2.1.2(now > they work together) > The following is related to lttng-tools-2.1.0 in /usr/local/lib after I > reinstalled it. > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1018130 May 18 13:50 liblttng-ctl.a > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1035 May 18 13:50 liblttng-ctl.la > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 18 13:50 liblttng-ctl.so -> > liblttng-ctl.so.0.0.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 18 13:50 liblttng-ctl.so.0 -> > liblttng-ctl.so.0.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 491876 May 18 13:50 liblttng-ctl.so.0.0.0 > > But it reports the same error as before. If it is a compatibility problem, > why my instrumented > J9 VM with lttng-ust.2.1.2 has no this errors? > > Yang > > ________________________________________ > From: Alexandre Montplaisir [[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 6:28 PM > To: Yang Wang > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers; Yannick Brosseau; David Goulet; Graeme Johnson; > Kenneth Kent; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Mariadb+LTTng 2.x > > Hi Yang, > > On 13-05-17 05:21 PM, Yang Wang wrote: > > It seems not this compatibility problem. I have removed all ust1.0 stuffs > > in the instrumented Mariadb code and > > replaced with lttng-ust 2.x say, tracepoint statements, trancepoint > > provider files, probes files and use the lib -llttng-ust instead of -lust. > > Anything I missed? > > Mathieu was talking about 2.0 vs 2.1, not 0.x vs 2.x. > > If you compiled your application with lttng-ust 2.1, make sure you use > lttng-tools 2.1 to trace it. lttng-tools 2.0 will not work. > > > > > Is "libust[7848/7853]: " reported from lttng-tools 2.0? Actually, this is > > printed from > > Yeah I think this is normal, this is old stuff that dates from the 0.x > days, but lttng-ust still prints it that way. > > > Cheers, > Alex > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
