On 08/06/2013 09:42 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Stefan Seefeld ([email protected]) wrote:
>> Yes, with the adjusted free() implementation as per this patch, I think
>> this is a robust solution. Do you think we need any form of multi-thread
>> protection ? Or can we assume that library initialization will have
>> completed by the time multiple threads could possibly call calloc() ?
> Well, considering that lttng-ust spawns thread in its constructor, it
> might indeed be a good thing to be thread-safe. Fixed by:
>
> commit d9e6d9a57fda6d3ad73016b2b3137997aac9c7ba
> Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue Aug 6 21:41:15 2013 -0400
>
> Fix: static_calloc should be thread-safe
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Seefeld <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
>
> Thoughts ?
Sorry, I'm confused. Where can I find this commit, i.e. what repo, what
branch ? I can't see it anywhere ?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
