Thanks a lot, Mathieu! On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Evgeniy Ivanov" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:11:47 AM >> Subject: [lttng-dev] Userspace RCU VS spin locks >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm very interested in RCU performance, especially applied to hash >> tables (rculfhash in particular). Did any body compare performance of >> QSBR or signal RCU VS scalable and non-scalable spin locks? >> > > Hi Evgeniy, > > You'll probably want to start by looking at my Linux Plumbers slides > presenting rculfhash: > > https://www.efficios.com/lpc2011-urcu > > Also, Paul McKenney's slides of the Userspace RCU tutorial here present other > numbers of a hash table example (including bucket-locks), AFAIK using his own > statically sized hash table implementation (not rculfhash): > > https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/userspace-rcu-tutorial-linuxcon-2013.pdf > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > >> -- >> Cheers, >> Evgeniy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lttng-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev >> > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com
-- Cheers, Evgeniy _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
