I'd like a clarification.  In overwrite mode, and assuming the writers are 
overwhelming the consumers, what is the behaviour?

   Assume we have this situation within a given channel (numbering the 
sub-buffers in chronological order), and the writers are about to catch up with 
the reader (the extra sub-buffer is double-bracketed and the sub-buffer it is 
"shadowing" is marked with a trailing asterisk):

[8] [9] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [[-]]   reader at [2], writers at [9], spare 
sub-buffer unused/unallocated

[8] [9] [10]* [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [[2]]   reader at [[2]], writers at [10], 
spare sub-buffer shadowing [10]

[8] [9] [10]* [11] [4] [5] [6] [7] [[2]]   reader at [[2]], writers at [11], 
spare sub-buffer shadowing [10]

   Now, when the reader completes evacuating [[2]], it moves on to [11] and 
realises there is a time gap.  I suspect it does not just jump its clock ahead, 
because that would give up on [4] through [10].  Does it skip to the next 
sub-buffer until it sees the clock go backward (the circularity of the buffer 
guarantees there is always one such discontinuity), resuming its work with [4]? 
 If yes, in the worst case the reader will go once around the sub-buffers, 
checking timestamps, before resuming its work.  This could be avoided if the 
buffer metadata kept the spare sub-buffer chained to the oldest one (i.e. the 
third step is [8] [9] [10] [11]* [4] [5] [6] [7] [[2]]), so the reader never 
needs to call "next()" more than once.  Is this what lttng already does?

Daniel U. Thibault
Protection des systèmes et contremesures (PSC) | Systems Protection & 
Countermeasures (SPC)
Cyber sécurité pour les missions essentielles (CME) | Mission Critical Cyber 
Security (MCCS)
R & D pour la défense Canada - Valcartier (RDDC Valcartier) | Defence R&D 
Canada - Valcartier (DRDC Valcartier)
2459 route de la Bravoure
Québec QC  G3J 1X5
CANADA
Vox : (418) 844-4000 x4245
Fax : (418) 844-4538
NAC : 918V QSDJ <http://www.travelgis.com/map.asp?addr=918V%20QSDJ>
Gouvernement du Canada | Government of Canada
<http://www.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/>

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

Reply via email to