* Jon Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jon Bernard" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <[email protected]> > > > Cc: "Stéphane Graber" <[email protected]>, "Alexandre Montplaisir" > > > <[email protected]>, > > > [email protected] > > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:45:21 AM > > > Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync > > > > > [...] > > > > > > That is not exactly what I intended to convey, let me be more direct > > > about my > > > view. I completely agree that sid should have 2.3.x immediately. I also > > > agree > > > that 2.3 should be targeted for testing, and therefore the next stable > > > release. > > > > Allright :) I'm glad we're on the same page, sorry for the misunderstanding. > > No worries. I'll add that future releases (like the upcoming 2.4) will > be prepared and tested all together prior to upload - to hopefully avoid > the previous situation/nightmare that I managed to get myself into. > > There can still be a sizable amount of work for 2.3 to fully land into > testing, so that is my primary focus. The freeze deadline is fast > approaching, so I will be keeping a close eye on things as they > progress. As things settle I'll post status here.
I think I've got the UST upgrade packages in good shape and I uploaded a new lttng-tools to fix the armel build earlier today. So, hopefully by just waiting a bit things should be in good shape and migrate into testing in early December (~10 days from now). At the moment, 2.3.0 is complete in unstable (sid). -- Jon _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
