On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Khouzam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello tracing tracers, > > I was wondering about the CTF readers, right now both babeltrace and the > java reader will look in the event header for "id" and "timestamp" and > they will also look for a variant "v". This works very well for LTTng > traces, but it provides an LTTng specific code path in theoretically > non-LTTng products. maybe it would be good to have in the spec that > timestamp and id are hard-coded in certain places. It would allow (not > garantied) minor performance improvements too since we know what to look > for all the time.
I've discussed this with Mathieu recently. It is in the plans for an eventual (minor) revision of the CTF specification. I think it was too early, at the time, to commit to specific field semantics. Thanks for your input! Regards, Jérémie > > Just a random though > > Matthew > > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Jérémie Galarneau EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
