Hi Stavros,

First, thanks for the interest :)

To add support for a new trace type to TMF, you basically have 2 options: either you first convert your trace to another supported format, or you write a parser in TMF. In practice, the second option is easier. There is, imho, not much gain in converting existing traces to CTF, that just ends up being an extra intermediate format. (On the other hand, if you tracer directly writes in CTF, that can net you advantages).

If your trace is in text format, it's possible to create a custom text parser, which you can define directly from the UI using regular expressions. If it's a binary format, then that requires writing some Java code.


Next, you'll typically want to add views/analyses for your trace type. The view in your screenshot look quite doable, using our generic Time Graph View. You can see a screenshot of the Control Flow and Resource View, both based on the Time Graph views, on that page:
http://eclipse.org/linuxtools/projectPages/lttng/

(Latest version also supports showing arrows in the time graph. The latest Control Flow View does so, to show the "flow" of each CPU. We should update that screenshot...)

Another thing to note, a very new feature in TMF is the possibility to define analyses and views using XML definitions, so you do not need to write Java code to create a custom view. This makes it VERY easy to create new views! The data-driven views are a bit more limited than the "Java-driven" ones (for example, I think right now arrows are not supported in the data-driven views), but it's slowly improving.


If you have any other questions, please let us know!

Cheers,
Alexandre



On 06/12/2014 07:56 AM, Stavros Giannakopoulos wrote:
Greetings,
i am running a project on behalf or Ericsson Sweden regarding tracing on a 
custom multicore architecture.

I came across your tools through a colleague and It seems that they might be 
appropriate for our work, especially TMF since we already utilize
eclipse quite heavily.

I have some technical questions though, and I would like some feedback so I 
know whether our specifications can be covered by that or some similar tool.

Please forward this email to the appropriate department if possible.

The specifications we have are:
1. The trace we are interested in is a process-centric view of the events (or 
actors in our system) along with their respective threads, that will run on 
specific cores.
2. We don't need to capture the traces, that has been already done, only to 
parse the generated file and produce a graphical view that includes the 
processes, threads, cores and the messages that trigger new processes.
is that possible?
3. We have the trace files in .lat format already which are generated by using 
the Flexus tools. What I want to know if there is a conversion tool available 
or we need to develop a script to do the conversion to a suitable format (CTF). 
And if the TMF or LTTV can produce this result from a custom trace file and not 
a kernel trace.

Observe on Fig 1 a simplified view of our needs. In practice there will be a 
few thousands processes in tens of cores and the start/end times and the 
messages are essential.

Fig 1: Example of result wanted.
[cid:[email protected]]


Please reply on my email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
or contact Johan Mellgren  at 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Regards,
Stavros Giannakopoulos



_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

Reply via email to