merged, thanks!

Mathieu

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Babeux" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "mathieu desnoyers" <[email protected]>, "Christian Babeux" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:42:28 AM
> Subject: [PATCH lttng-ust] Fix: Wrong configure check for UST perf event 
> counters context support
> 
> When building on non-x86 platforms, the build errors out with the following:
> 
>   CC       lttng-context-perf-counters.lo
> lttng-context-perf-counters.c:95:2: error: #error "Perf event counters are
> only supported on x86 so far."
> lttng-context-perf-counters.c: In function 'read_perf_counter':
> lttng-context-perf-counters.c:114:4: warning: implicit declaration of
> function 'rdpmc' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> make[2]: *** [lttng-context-perf-counters.lo] Error 1
> 
> The configure script checks for the presence of the "perf_event.h" header to
> enable support for
> perf events counters. However, the current implementation is only available
> on x86,
> hence the build fails on platform where the perf header is available.
> 
> Fix this issue by detecting the architecture we are currently building and
> wether
> to enable or not the support for perf event counters context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Babeux <[email protected]>
> ---
>  configure.ac | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 76851db..4841f46 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -194,9 +194,23 @@ AC_CHECK_LIB([urcu-bp], [call_rcu_bp], [],
> [AC_MSG_ERROR([liburcu 0.6 or newer i
>  
>  # optional linux/perf_event.h
>  AC_CHECK_HEADERS([linux/perf_event.h], [have_perf_event=yes], [])
> -AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_PERF_EVENT], [test "x$have_perf_event" = "xyes"])
>  
> -if test "x$have_perf_event" = "xyes"; then
> +# Perf event counters are only supported on x86 so far.
> +AC_MSG_CHECKING([UST support for architecture perf event counters])
> +case $host_cpu in
> +changequote(,)dnl
> +     i[3456]86)
> +changequote([,])dnl
> +     UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS=yes;;
> +     x86_64) UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS=yes;;
> +     amd64) UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS=yes;;
> +     *) UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS=no;;
> +esac
> +AC_MSG_RESULT([$UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS])
> +
> +AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_PERF_EVENT], [test "x$have_perf_event" = "xyes" -a
> "x$UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS" = "xyes"])
> +
> +if test "x$have_perf_event" = "xyes" -a
> "x$UST_SUPPORT_FOR_ARCH_PERF_EVENT_COUNTERS" = "xyes"; then
>  AC_DEFINE([LTTNG_UST_HAVE_PERF_EVENT], [1])
>  fi
>  
> --
> 1.9.3
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

Reply via email to