On 12/12/2014 01:33 PM, Jérémie Galarneau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: >> By accident I attempted to build lttng-tools stable-2.6 branch >> against current lttng-ust master, and got: >> >> trace-ust.c: In function 'trace_ust_create_event': >> trace-ust.c:430:11: error: 'struct lttng_ust_event' has no member named >> 'disabled' >> lue->attr.disabled = 1; >> ^ >> I found the commit below, which seems to indicate that this may be >> anticipated/intentional, but I figured I'd raise the issue in case >> it's not. Breaking source compatibility with lttng-tools doesn't >> seem like a big deal, but does the removal of the 'disabled' field in >> lttng-ust/master present a problem for other users of the library? > > It's not a problem for instrumented applications as this is strictly a > sessiond <-> UST communication change.
OK, thanks for confirming. _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
