Ok. I will try the live mode. Looks like it will solve the purpose. On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Chidhu R <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, is there a way to redirect all tracepoints to console instead of > selective? > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chidhu R <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Jeremie. >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Jérémie Galarneau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chidhu, >>> >>> LTTng does not support selective output of tracepoints to the console. >>> The closest thing I can recommend is using the "live" mode locally. >>> >>> Jérémie >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Chidhu R <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > I was looking for a way to trace to console rather than save to disk / >>> > stream. I read about lttng tracef feature. But it does not include the >>> wide >>> > range of benefits brought by tracepoints. So what I want is to use the >>> > tracepoints and trace to console instead. For example, if there are 5 >>> > tracepoint events, I want to trace 3 of them to console and let the >>> other go >>> > the disk or whatever. How to achieve this. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Chid >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > lttng-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jérémie Galarneau >>> EfficiOS Inc. >>> http://www.efficios.com >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
