Hi Mathieu,
We aim to trace SYSCALL in kernel space. In general, what would be the
obstacles to support RHEL6? Or what are key kernel patches to be necessary?
Regards
Hai
--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人："Mathieu Desnoyers "<mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>;
发送时间：2019年7月30日(星期二) 晚上10:04
收件人："杨海" <hai.y...@magic-shield.com>;
抄送："Jonathan Rajotte "<jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com>;"lttng-dev
"<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>;
主题：Re: [lttng-dev] 回复:Re: 回复:Re: Pros and Cons of LTTng
-----------------------------------
Hi,
The current LTTng kernel tracer (lttng-modules) supports Linux 3.0+ only.
If you only need to trace user-space, you might be able to use lttng-tools and
lttng-ust
on an older kernel. Please refer to the README.md files of each project for
information
about their environment prerequisites.
The RHEL6 kernel variant based on 2.6.32-2.6.35 Linux kernels has never been
supported by
the LTTng 2.x kernel tracers without kernel patching.
Thanks,
Mathieu
----- On Jul 29, 2019, at 8:34 PM, 杨海 <hai.y...@magic-shield.com> wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks. I am looking for packages for older distributions like CentOS 6 (with
kernel 2.6) but could not find it. And which kernel version is minimum
requirement for LTTng?
Regards
Hai
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Mathieu Desnoyers"<mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>;
Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2019 11:48 PM
To: "杨海"<hai.y...@magic-shield.com>;
Cc: "Jonathan Rajotte"<jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com>;
"lttng-dev"<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>;
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] 回复:Re: 回复:Re: Pros and Cons of LTTng
----- On Jul 25, 2019, at 4:21 PM, 杨海 <hai.y...@magic-shield.com> wrote:
Hi
Thanks for quick response.
LTTng is really impressive on performance，especially under heavy workload. When
using it on critical machines，stability is also essential.
I wonder how LTTng is commercialized and any products or OS distributions
already enabled it.
I took a look at lttng-modules bug list，there are a few kernel oops years ago
and got resolved. May I say it is very stable or it has not been fully tested?
Hi,
EfficiOS has had commercial customers using LTTng in production for many years
now.
LTTng per-se is distributed as packages in all major Linux distributions.
EfficiOS also provides
more up-to-date packages for some distributions through
http://packages.efficios.com/
The way we commercialize LTTng is through funding for design and implementation
of
customer's feature requests. We also provide commercial support tailored to
specific
customer's environments, which includes SLA and continuous integration testing
of specific
environments.
If those are services you are interested in, please feel free to contact us in
private so we
can further discuss your needs.
Best regards,
Mathieu
regards
Hai
--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人："Jonathan Rajotte-Julien "<jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com>;
发送时间：2019年7月23日(星期二) 上午6:20
收件人："杨海" <hai.y...@magic-shield.com>;
抄送："lttng-dev "<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>;
主题：Re: 回复:Re: [lttng-dev] Pros and Cons of LTTng
-----------------------------------
Hi,
> As to LD_PRELOAD, it is also used for privilege escalation. Will it be
> regarded as vulnerability and forbidden on some Linux systems?
It could yes.
In that case you will be limited to the syscalls interface for the libc
observability unless you instrument it and distribute it.
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
