* Iain Sandoe: >> On 15 Jan 2024, at 15:35, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> * Carlos O'Donell: >> >>> I agree. TLS should be seen more like .bss/.data rather than something >>> that is allocated with malloc(). >> >> There wasn't consensus regarding this in 2014. See below. >> >>> If we leak memory via TLS that is a glibc bug that we can deal with, >> >> This is something that libgcc_s.so.1 does in GCC 14 if the heap >> trampolines are used. > > Is there a GCC BZ for this? > (if there is something we should address in GCC, it would be better sooner)
Sorry, I wanted to write a reproducer first. With it, I found two more issue. Memory (resource) leak in -ftrampoline-impl=heap <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113401> Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1 <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402> __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr should be dynamically linked by default <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113403> Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
