On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:45:49PM +0200, Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote: > Le 30/05/2010 16:41, Khaled Hosny a écrit : > >> There is a lot of alternative solutions that could have worked in the > >> meanwhile > >> (more reliably than making assumptions about the current working > >> directory, I mean). > > > > Right, but I don't like writing code that I know it soon will be > > obsoleted, > > You prefer commiting files that you know will soon be useless? ;-)
Because 'git rm foo; git commit -m "foo bar"; git push' is a lot cheaper than going through the code reading lengthy comments about this hack and that work around and knowing what was fixed and what not. > > I never claimed luaofload is bug free, or even working at all, the only > > reason it was uploaded to CTAN is for more people to test it. If I'm > > supposed to test everything, or anything at all, then I don't think it > > is going to be released, ever. (hint, STIX 1.0.0 :) > > > We sure can't test everything, but I still find it annoying to release > something > that doesn't have any chance of working out of our local installation. So > maybe > there's a balance between that and never releasing. Though I completely agree with you, I can't guarantee this will not happen again. -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
