Ulrike Fischer a écrit :
As far as I understood him (I had written him about it too) he
simply doesn't want to make the impression that xunicode is lualatex
compatible when he actually doesn't know it.
Precisely.
I would say it would be better. There would be only one list of all
the definitions. And it would mean that xunicode is tested by the
lualatex users - and so Ross could get some feed back about possible
problems.
Also it should be easy for xelatex users to try out lualatex. A lot
of this users load xunicode. One should avoid to force them to
remove a package or to add a lot of \ifxetex-switches -- not only to
make life easier for the users but also for people like me who tries
to explain them how to switch from pdftex to a unicode engine like
xetex or luatex.
I totally agree with you that there should be a way to load xunicode
with LuaTeX, but, sadly, there is nothing I can do about it... The only
thing we could do is to create a euxunicode package that loads it, so
that it would be common to XeTeX and LuaTeX. Do you (all) think it would
be a good idea to separate euxunicode from euenc? I can't remember the
reasons why we melt it together at the first place...
Thank you,
--
Elie
