On 07/12/2011 04:33 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 07/12/2011 04:22 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
With xetex I can at least use
\XeTeXmathcharnumdef\test=\XeTeXmathcodenum`\x
but none of the various combination of \Umathchardef + \Umathcode
etc seems to work in luatex.
NYI, see:
Actually, that does not mean I think it is a good idea. The
conceptual problem is that \XeTeXmathcodenum (and therefore
also \Umathcodenum) can return a signed int to represent an
unsigned value, with is pretty horrible.
Why is it so important to be able to do a mathcharnumdef
(instead of a macro definition or straight \Umathchardef?)
