On 15 Sep 2011, at 22:09, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 22:02, SKL wrote: >> >> I am in no position to argue as to whether fontenc should be fixed, or LM >> should be included in the Basic distro, but I would think that if either the >> one or the other would happen that might be highly beneficial for the >> non-expert users of (Xe)TeX > > I'm not entitled to decide either, but you need to keep in mind that > xetex is not included in basic collection either. > > It was most probably added to MacTeX Basic as an add-on. In the same > way LM fonts could be added even if TL per se won't be changed. > > Mojca
It is part of the package - if you download it from http://www.tug.org/mactex/morepackages.html and if you unzip the package you'll find the xetex executable in it. Excluding xetex from MTBasic and sticking it into an add-on together with LM might of course be another solution.
