On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Jim Whitehead II <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas <[email protected]> > wrote: >> "make macosx" for me produces an executable that exports the correct >> symbols, unlike the one in your first listing... are you using the >> stock Lua makefiles or have they been changed for Homebrew? >> >> -- >> Fabio Mascarenhas >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jim Whitehead II <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Check your "lua" executable, to see what symbols it is exporting. How >>>> did you compile it? >>> >>> It was compiled with make macosx; make install. >>> >>> http://pastey.net/138135 >>> >>> The luaL_ symbols are present in liblua.a >>> >>> http://pastey.net/138136 > > There are some minor differences (using cc instead of gcc and changing > /usr/local to another prefix, but other than that it's just lua-5.1.4 > patchlevel 2. I'll try to post some more debug information in a > second.. having issues at the moment with luarocks just being a dummy > script ><
Here's the verbose log from the install of lua: http://pastebin.ca/1891926 and luarocks: http://pastebin.ca/1891927 This is really beginning to annoy me =) - Jim > _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
