Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote > I see several GPL-ed rocks in the list. > > I'm not an active GPL-hater, but is it a good thing to have them?
I think that any rock with an open source license should be welcome in the Lua community for some reasons: (1) It makes more rocks available, (2) gives an option for developers who want to ensure access to the derived code, (3) allows the distribution of rocks which _must_ be GPLed because it uses GPL libraries, and (4) any developer already checks the license of the code he uses. -- Alexandre Erwin Ittner - [email protected] OpenPGP pubkey 0x0041A1FB @ http://pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
