Well, while we still do not have a proper replacement for LuaForge, I have changed the LuaForge references and urls in this page (and a couple others where they also appeared) to github ones (I am not sure Hisham will be amused :-) ).
-- Fabio Mascarenhas On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 04:53, Chris Babcock <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sep 8, 2010 5:47 PM, "Alexander Gladysh" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> See, for example, http://luarocks.org/en/Creating_a_rock >>> Is it still a good idea to promote LuaForge given its current sad state? > >> Whatever comes along next will be better off for whatever content it is able >> to inherit, so unless there's a specific problem with labor, bandwidth or >> some other constraint I'd strongly recommend it. > > The problem is that it is unknown if it will able to inherit anything > beyond some point of failure. > > I've got an impression that it is better to keep your data as far off > LuaForge as possible — until it will be reborn. > > And LuaForge being reborn is a point quite far in a future, I think. :-( > > Alexander. > > _______________________________________________ > Luarocks-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers > _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
