On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 21:09, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote: >> I made a small Lua-only binary which depends on a couple of rocks: > >> http://github.com/agladysh/json2lua > >> Now I'm thinking to write a rockspec for it — I think that LR has >> support for this. > > Another question: > > The tool itself is ready to be tagged for the next release (v0.2), but > it depends on the scm-only component, my lua-nucleo library > (http://github.com/lua-nucleo/lua-nucleo). > > The functionality that I use here from lua-nucleo is stable, but I'm > not ready to tag release in lua-nucleo itself (no documentation, not > enough tests etc.). > > So, the question is: should I offer "fixed-version" rockspec for > json2lua, or should I provide a scm-only rockspec? > > Or maybe, should I tag v0.0.1 for lua-nucleo and stop fussing about it? > > Fourth option: do you know fully-functional (!) Lua table > pretty-printer with configurable line width and indent, which has a > rockspec?
In any way, I've tagged v0.2. Here are the rockspecs: http://github.com/agladysh/json2lua/raw/master/rockspec/json2lua-0.2-1.rockspec http://github.com/agladysh/json2lua/raw/master/rockspec/json2lua-scm-1.rockspec If fixed-version rockspec is inappropriate here (it probably is not), please answer the questions above. I will fix it after getting advice on recommended practice. Alexander. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
