On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 13:22, steve donovan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote: >> BTW, note that this is a valid job for a prerequisite_check hook >> (happens before dependencies are installed) -- if it will be able to >> patch the rockspec, of course.
> Occurs to me that there's an easier solution - make a binary rock for > the package and the 'include' check for external dependencies is > bypassed. Can you please elaborate, how to do this? > This will be quicker in any case, and you have your own > repos so there can't be a clash. Well, it will work for *me*. As other solutions will -- for example, patching the rockspec (that's what I actiully did, can't say I'm happy with it but it works). But it is a workaround, not a generic solution. > Will need to do this for all of your target architectures of course, > but it will save deployment time. Alexander. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
