On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:14 AM, steve donovan <[email protected]> wrote: > This may seem like a small thing, but it's psychologically important. > (And while we're talking about additions to the rockspec format...) > > When I packaged lcomplex, I hesitated to use the maintainer field, > because although it's true that I'm the _package_ maintainer, I also > wanted to express the important fact that Luiz was the author. The > roles are quite distinct. > > Yes, we could adopt the convention that description.detailed contains > the original author name, but...
Noted. I'm taking notes for a revision of the rockspec format. Of course, I'll bring it for a round of discussion in this list when I have a first proposal ready. In the meantime, comments and suggestions like this are most welcome. Thanks, -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
