On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Natanael Copa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, steve donovan > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Natanael Copa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> fwiw, luaposix is maintained. lposix is not or luaposix would never >>> existed in first place. >> >> That's the impression I get, and perhaps we should try to prefer >> luaposix over lposix for this reason... >> >> (It's the one packaged in Debian, for instance.) >> >> Does Luiz have any comment to make on this? > > http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2007-05/msg00087.html
Does any module require lposix specifically (ie, being dependent on lposix and incompatible with luaposix)? Would anyone mind if it was removed from the LuaRocks repository? -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
