On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM, RJP Computing <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I found another bug. I you launch webrocks using '--local' it errors > out removing/uninstalling. It seems like you need to pass the '--local' flag > to the call to luarocks.
Yes, I forgot it - was worrying too much about getting --from and --only-from passed. An area that needs work is determining the list of installed rocks accurately. If it is --local, then I have to check the repo when parsing the output of 'luarocks list' to ensure that these are not globally available? (in a consistent world, 'luarocks list --local' would do this directly; a fairly easy change.) > Also how do I use a locally installed version of LuaRocks. One solution is something like --luarocks=/my/private/luarocks to override the global 'luarocks' There is a feature I'd like to get in, maybe not in this release. And that is to colour installed packages differently if a newer version is available. The sudo-business is a hack, but AFAIK you cannot then unsudo some commands if everything is run under sudo ;) steve d. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
