It is standard for distributions to not put their own things in /usr/local. Now... If you mean that they do not even have it in the std reference path, that's no good. You're either going to need to use the environment variables (LUA_PATH,...) perform your own install of Lua, or install luarocks into /usr, as opposed to /usr/local (putting in paths supposed to be managed by Fedora)
On 10/28/10, steve donovan <[email protected]> wrote: > Now, Fedora is not my idea of a fun operating system, but sometimes > you just gotta (and apparently it has a lot of fans.) > > The cool thing is that lua is already installed on FC 12. The uncool > thing is that the Lua module path is at /usr/share not at > /usr/local/share, etc. > > Why people mess with standards is another question, but the current > question is: > > how to persuade LR that modules must go to this location? > > steve d. > > _______________________________________________ > Luarocks-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers > -- Thomas Harning Jr. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
