On Nov 23, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Hisham wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM, steve donovan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Is it still broken? We did change it from *a to *l.
>> 
>> Yes, the output format is different from md5sum. Doug proposed a
>> pattern that did the right thing whatever the tool.
> 
> Okay, the output format is different, but get_md5 handles it
> differently -- I thought the only problem was the linebreak. I tested
> it here using openssl as the md5checker and it seems to work. Did you
> have any problems with 2.0.4-rc1?


Frankly, I did not try it... but I noticed that the read was deliberately 
changed from *l to *a in the past, and assumed it must have been for a good 
reason. So, it seems like the safer fix is to change the pattern to avoid the 
line ending issue altogether.

e
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers

Reply via email to