On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 17:56, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> build = "none"
>> copy_directories = { "lib/foo" }
>> Instead of being installed into $(luarocks show --rock-dir
>> myrock)/lib/foo, as expected, files in lib/foo are installed in
>> /usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/foo.
>> If I wanted that, I'd use install.lib! :-(
>> LuaRocks (2.0.4-rc2) is again trying to be smarter than user. That is
>> bad. LuaRocks is a low-level package management tool. It must do what
>> it is told and nothing more.
>> I hope that is a bug and it would be fixed in 2.0.4...
> Right now the behavior will stay as is.
Please document this explicitly then.
Alexander.
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
