Still not updated? On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gabriel Duarte <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm sending the package lnotify, intead of lua-notify, to avoid mistakes! > I hope it works! > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:34 PM, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Send Luarocks-developers mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> >> http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers >> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Luarocks-developers digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess with my executables? >> (Hisham) >> 2. Re: Re: update the package (Gabriel Duarte) (Hisham) >> 3. Re: List of files in a rockspec (Hisham) >> 4. Re: LuaRocks for packaging (1): /../rocks/manifest (Hisham) >> 5. Re: [ANN] LuaRocks 2.0.4-rc2 (Hisham) >> 6. Re: Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess with my executables? >> (Alexander Gladysh) >> 7. Re: List of files in a rockspec (Alexander Gladysh) >> 8. Re: LuaRocks for packaging (1): /../rocks/manifest >> (Ildar Mulyukov) >> 9. Re: Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess with my executables? >> (Hisham) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:15:52 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess >> with my executables? >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> >> <[email protected]<aanlktims1fxtjntmwzpfz5dr%[email protected]> >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:18, steve donovan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I could understand this if I used build.type = "builtin" (and even >> >>> then I'd like this to be off by default). >> > >> >>> But build.type = "none" must not change any files by definition! >> > >> >> Alas, some operating systems have feeble shells and need the wrapping. >> > >> >> But certainly in this case one would like some guarantee of sane >> delivery! >> > >> >> Maybe something to consider when thinking about the new rockspec >> format? >> > >> > In my opinion, this is a fatal bug in LuaRocks, and it should be fixed >> > immediately. >> >> This behavior has been here for a long time. Is it breaking something? >> >> -- Hisham >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:17:35 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Re: update the package (Gabriel >> Duarte) >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> >> <[email protected]<pr%[email protected]> >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Gabriel Duarte <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Ok Alexander, I'll change to lnotify as soon as possible! >> > Cheers! >> >> In this case I'll wait for the rockspec with updated names. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Hisham >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:20:01 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] List of files in a rockspec >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, list! >> > >> > I've got a set of lua-only rockspecs which use build "none" or >> > "builtin" with mix of copy_directories and install.bin clauses. (Maybe >> > something else, but only build modes are none and builtin only.) >> > >> > To determine if I should rebuild a rock, I need a quick and dirty way >> > to get a list of files which would get into rock file if I'd say >> > `luarocks make` on that rockspec. >> > >> > Note that the list should come with resolved symlinks. >> > >> > Any clues? Can I reuse LuaRocks code for that somehow? >> >> As far as I remember, that information is not available in advance in >> LuaRocks. It is inferrable for these build types, but there's no quick >> and dirty way available now. After build, you can check the >> rock_manifest file for each rock. >> >> -- Hisham >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:21:49 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaRocks for packaging (1): >> /../rocks/manifest >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ildar Mulyukov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, people. >> > 1st, I'd like to recognize LuaRocks as most accurate program in Lua I've >> > seen. It is a good example for me. >> > I have an idea to use LR for packaging just like jpackage is used for >> Java >> > modules. >> > >> > The first question I want to ask: >> > /usr/lib/luarocks/rocks/manifest looks like a cache. How do I restore it >> if >> > it's lost? >> >> There is a command for that: >> luarocks-admin make-manifest >> >> Thanks, >> -- Hisham >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:22:36 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] [ANN] LuaRocks 2.0.4-rc2 >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> >> <[email protected]<aanlktinayosdiph3xm%2b1bzndbpe%2bxv_ohqr%[email protected]> >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 03:39, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Here's a preview release of LuaRocks 2.0.4. This is a release >> >> candidate: if no problems are reported, these packages will be renamed >> >> into the final versions. >> > >> > Hisham, I'm sorry to nag, but is there a schedule for 2.0.4 release? >> >> Some issues have surfaced and I haven't been able to look at them >> before. I'll post another rc today. >> >> -- Hisham >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:50:21 +0300 >> From: Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess >> with my executables? >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 17:15, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:18, steve donovan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Alexander Gladysh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> I could understand this if I used build.type = "builtin" (and even >> >>>> then I'd like this to be off by default). >> >> >>>> But build.type = "none" must not change any files by definition! >> >> >> In my opinion, this is a fatal bug in LuaRocks, and it should be fixed >> >> immediately. >> >> > This behavior has been here for a long time. Is it breaking something? >> >> Please see the original example. >> >> It is breaking #! feature. And it is doing it silently. >> >> I have executable Lua script that is intended to be run with another >> interpreter (not necessary LuaJIT btw). I can not install this script >> with LuaRocks. I have to use a shell-script wrapper. This is not very >> sane, in my opinion. >> >> Alexander. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:52:49 +0300 >> From: Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] List of files in a rockspec >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 17:20, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> I've got a set of lua-only rockspecs which use build "none" or >> >> "builtin" with mix of copy_directories and install.bin clauses. (Maybe >> >> something else, but only build modes are none and builtin only.) >> >> >> To determine if I should rebuild a rock, I need a quick and dirty way >> >> to get a list of files which would get into rock file if I'd say >> >> `luarocks make` on that rockspec. >> >> >> Note that the list should come with resolved symlinks. >> >> >> Any clues? Can I reuse LuaRocks code for that somehow? >> >> > As far as I remember, that information is not available in advance in >> > LuaRocks. It is inferrable for these build types, but there's no quick >> > and dirty way available now. After build, you can check the >> > rock_manifest file for each rock. >> >> But the whole point is to avoid building the rock. >> >> OK, I guess I have to code something here from scratch. I can do it in >> my own ecosystem as a closed source, or I can do it in some >> LuaRocks-friendly way and opensource it. If someone would tell me what >> is the LuaRocks-friendly way in this case. >> >> Alexander. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 8 >> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:18:38 +0600 >> From: Ildar Mulyukov <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaRocks for packaging (1): >> /../rocks/manifest >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed >> >> On 14.12.2010 20:21:49, Hisham wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ildar Mulyukov >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hello, people. >> > > 1st, I'd like to recognize LuaRocks as most accurate program in Lua >> > I've >> > > seen. It is a good example for me. >> > > I have an idea to use LR for packaging just like jpackage is used >> > for Java >> > > modules. >> > > >> > > The first question I want to ask: >> > > /usr/lib/luarocks/rocks/manifest looks like a cache. How do I >> > restore it if >> > > it's lost? >> > >> > There is a command for that: >> > luarocks-admin make-manifest >> >> Hi, Hisham >> thanks for the hint. It is what I need. Unfortunately, it seems to fail >> on rock trees other then /usr/lib/luarocks/rocks: >> $ luarocks-admin make_manifest ~/.luarocks/lib/luarocks/rocks/ >> ... >> Error: rock_manifest file not found for xssfilter 8.04.20-1 - not a >> LuaRocks 2 tree? >> >> strace proves that luarocks-admin seeks rock_manifest in >> /usr/lib/luarocks/rocks/... This looks like a bug, right? >> >> Best regards, >> -- >> Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer >> ================================================ >> email: [email protected] >> home: http://johan-notes.blogspot.com/ >> ALT Linux Sisyphus >> ================================================ >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:34:16 -0200 >> From: Hisham <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Re: How to stop LuaRocks to mess >> with my executables? >> To: LuaRocks developers list <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 17:15, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:18, steve donovan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Alexander Gladysh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> I could understand this if I used build.type = "builtin" (and even >> >>>>> then I'd like this to be off by default). >> > >> >>>>> But build.type = "none" must not change any files by definition! >> > >> >>> In my opinion, this is a fatal bug in LuaRocks, and it should be fixed >> >>> immediately. >> > >> >> This behavior has been here for a long time. Is it breaking something? >> > >> > Please see the original example. >> > >> > It is breaking #! feature. And it is doing it silently. >> > >> > I have executable Lua script that is intended to be run with another >> > interpreter (not necessary LuaJIT btw). I can not install this script >> > with LuaRocks. I have to use a shell-script wrapper. This is not very >> > sane, in my opinion. >> >> See the attached patch. It adds a config option called "no_wrappers" >> which you can set to true in your config.lua. >> >> -- Hisham >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: no-wrappers.diff >> Type: application/octet-stream >> Size: 863 bytes >> Desc: not available >> Url : >> http://lists.luaforge.net/pipermail/luarocks-developers/attachments/20101214/7995f800/no-wrappers.obj >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Luarocks-developers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers >> >> >> End of Luarocks-developers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 8 >> ************************************************** >> > > > > -- > Gabriel Duarte > Linux User #471185 > Rio de Janeiro - RJ > http://w3.impa.br/~gabrield > > Phones: > (55) (21) 9463-7760 -> Mobile > (55) (21) 2464-9302 -> Home > (55) (21) 2529-5080 -> Work > -- Gabriel Duarte Linux User #471185 Rio de Janeiro - RJ http://w3.impa.br/~gabrield Phones: (55) (21) 9463-7760 -> Mobile (55) (21) 2464-9302 -> Home (55) (21) 2529-5080 -> Work
_______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
