On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:13, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:07, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> >> wrote:
>> Maybe Steve's "lake" will be the ultimate Lua-based build tool that >> will solve everyone's problems. Me, I'd be happy to have build.type = >> "lake" and just let LuaRocks require "lake" and hand over the >> environment. I added the "builtin" build.type because I had to go >> through too many rusty Makefiles from Kepler that had a ton of >> variables just to build an .so file, but I was aware that features >> like that would give the wrong "and-I'll-make-you-coffee-too" >> impression. > This may be a good idea as long as I'll be able to install Lua modules > without lake (also, I'd drop "make" etc. types — but this can harm > adoption...) Correction: install Lua modules without *knowing* lake. If Lake is bundled with LR or required by it in some other way, no problem. Alexander. _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
