On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:25:59 +0000 [email protected] wrote:
> Any particular reason for forking it? Yes. Somehow, i managed to overlook the lrexlib rocks (guess i must have searched http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/ only for "regex", not "regular"...). But after i found out about Lrexlib-POSIX, i still prefer mine: its much smaller and regex.match() looks better than rex_posix.match(). > Instead of adding another > different rock for regular expressions, it would be probably better to > update the lrexlib rockspec to version 2.6.0 instead. Yes... but... i hate the idea of renaming it back to luaopen_rex_posix. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
