On 12.07.2012 00:48:53, Hisham wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Ildar Mulyukov > > Q: Why the site_config.lua is put into /usr/share? This supposed to > be > > ARCH-independent dir. It can be safely moved to: > > lib_modules_path.."/luarocks". Like mine: > >> mkdir -p %buildroot%lua_modulesdir/%name > >> #Arch-dependant parts > >> mv %buildroot%lua_modulesdir_noarch/%name/\ > >> site_config.lua \ > >> %buildroot%lua_modulesdir/%name > > True. I'm just about to make a new release so this won't make it, but > could you register an issue on this so it doesn't get buried in the > mailing list?
Sure! https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/issues/86 BTW looking into LR code, I see package.path manipulations including /usr/share/lua/5.1/?.lua but not /usr/lib/lua/5.1/?.lua . Be warned. Regards, -- Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer ================================================ email: il...@users.sourceforge.net home: http://johan-notes.blogspot.com/ ALT Linux Sisyphus ================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
