Добрый день, Александр.
I hope you know my [work on this
topic](http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c1294756612.2518.0%40ildar.innovations.kz%3e).
[There's a
post](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.altlinux.devel/77294) in
russian too.
Though multi-arch issue still is not addressed.
Don't hesitate contacting me on this topic.
Ildar.
On 13.09.2012 20:09:17, Alexander V. Nikolaev wrote:
> Originally patch was developed as workaround to two major problems.
>
> 1) Luarocks have problems in multiarch environment (ie recent ubuntu
> --
> precise) -- few binary rocks requires lib*-dev even for installing
> prebuilt rocks.
>
> 2) We have problem with system-level dependencies, LR+rockspecs allow
> us
> to check dependencies on shared libraries, but not pull them.
> I make effort to package rocks into individual debian packages, using
> gem2deb and python-stdeb as proof-of-concept and reference
> implementation. But without patch we can't use /usr/local and in-home
> rocks trees in conjuction with system provided rocks.
>
> Maybe we should formalize list of rocks trees in config file?
> (declare -- which trees can participate in dependency resolving, which
> trees managed by external tools (dpkg, rpm and their friends), etc)
--
Ildar Mulyukov, free SW designer/programmer
================================================
email: il...@users.sourceforge.net
blog: http://johan-notes.blogspot.com/
ALT Linux Sisyphus
================================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
