On 4 March 2013 05:10, steve donovan <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, TNHarris <tellia...@whoopdedo.org> wrote: >> I think the "right" thing is to apply the Debian patch[1] and build a local >> DEB for install on your system. > > That's true. A naive upgrade leaves LR using /usr, where it should > really be using /usr/local. (Otherwise Debian and LR packages crash > into each other).
It does? I'm not sure I'm following correctly. The default installation of LR uses /usr/local, exactly to avoid clashing with packages installed by the OS package manager... > The _easiest_ solution is to un-install LR from the package manager > and do a straight LR install. Again checking if I understood you right: what you originally suggested was for LR to detect a Debian environment and to install itself by default on top of (and with the same settings as) the LR installed by Debian, right? And yes, to avoid clashes it's always cleaner to use either the package manager install or the "upstream" install, but not try to mix both. -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
