On 29 March 2013 02:34, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@vaughan.pe> wrote: > Rockspec for stdlib version 34-2 attached.
I noticed the rockspec is identical, apart from the revision number. Did you move the "release-34" tag in git? (That's not considered good practice, AFAIK). The "-2" suffix in a rockspec refers to the rockspec revision only, not to the version of the actual project. If there were any changes in your code, please pack it as a new numbered version, either as 35 or 34.2, and then release it as 35-1 or 34.2-1. If you're decided on calling your version number "34-2", then unfortunately that numbering is incompatible with LuaRocks, and we'll have to rename it to something like "34.2" in order to use "34.2-1" for the full version-revision string. The reason for that is because we support hyphens in package names, so "stdlib-34-2-1.rockspec" would be ambiguous: it currently parses as "stdlib-34" version "2", revision "1". Thank you, -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
