On May 6, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Philipp Janda <siffie...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I want to start a discussion, what (if anything) can be done to improve > the state of luarocks for Lua 5.2. Is releasing a rockspec that patches > other people's code ok? Should we modify rockspecs fixing the > dependencies of other people's rocks? I am in favor of a rule (despite the fact that I've retroactively violated it) that no rockspec may be posted on the official repositories unless it specifies a maximum compatible version of Lua. I'd also have no objection if, after some warning period to rockspecs authors, rockspecs that only specify "lua >= 5.1" are changed to "lua >= 5.1, < 5.2" e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
