> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Currie [mailto:doug.cur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: maandag 6 mei 2013 23:34
> To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Hostile rockspec takeover
> 
> 
> On May 6, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Paul K <paulclin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > For example, my Mobdebug module specified "lua >= 5.1" as its
> > dependency and it indeed works with 5.1 and 5.2 as advertised (or at
> > least as much as I tested it with 5.2). I wouldn't want that to be
> > interpreted as "< 5.2".
> 
> Yeah, that's why I just changed lsqlite3 to "lua >= 5.1, < 5.3" since it
> is compatible with Lua 5.2 (but cannot claim to be compatible with Lua
> 5.3!).
> 
> e

The problem is Lua releases breaking compatibility (except the patch releases). 
So adding a maximum version compatibility is not bad imo.
Wrt hostile takeover; It has been mentioned before to split the role of 
developer and packager.

Thijs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and 
their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed 
leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. 
Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers

Reply via email to