On 18 June 2013 22:12, Ignacio Burgueño <iburgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> About struct being called 1.4 instead of 0.2, it is what struct.c says at
> the top:
>
> ** {======================================================
> ** Library for packing/unpacking structures.
> ** $Id: struct.c,v 1.4 2012/07/04 18:54:29 roberto Exp $
> ** See Copyright Notice at the end of this file
> ** =======================================================Isn't that the version of the file in the version control system? Roberto uses an ancient SCM (RCS? I can't recally) but I know CVS uses file revision numbers like that in $id$ strings, so I think the one he uses does that too. But since we already have 1.2 there (back from when struct was just a C file), let's go with 1.4 now. I'll ping Roberto about the confusion. > I also sent a rockspec for struct a while ago, but it went unnoticed. > Alexey's version is better since it deals correctly with Lua versions ( "lua >>= 5.1, < 5.3" ) Sorry about missing it! Alexey's rockspec is now up. -- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
