Thomas Harning Jr. <harningt@...> writes: > > The ideal situation would be for there to be some sort of information made available to the compiled C code (ex: TARGET_WINVER, TARGET__WIN32_WINNT, ...) that way the C code could do something like: > > > #if TARGET_WINVER < DESIRED_WINVER > #error The compilation target is too old to support this module, .... > #else > #define _WINVER DESIRED_WINVER > #endif > >
Luarocks already know on which windows version it works. So it can define correct _WIN32_WINNT/WINVER. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa383745%28v=vs.85%29.aspx I really do not understand why you need TARGET_WINVER/TARGET__WIN32_WINNT instead using directly _WIN32_WINNT/WINVER. Luasocket already need this facility. Now it manually define WINVER as 0x502(Win2k3) in rockspec. But i do not know is it work on Vista/Win7/etc. The problem only with cross-compiling. But i do not know how this is important. There no much binary rocks and there already big problem with runtime libraries. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
