Hi,
Would it be possible to use named trees? The current list of trees is defined
by a path, or the `--local` option.
Then again the `list` command doesn't list the contents of `--local`
So I figured if trees could be named; eg. 'system' and 'local' in a default
installation, then the `--local` option could be dropped, as it could be
replaced by `tree=local`. It would also make it easy to use things like
`tree=system51`, `tree=zbs`, or `tree=mytestapp`
rocks_trees = {
{name = [[system]], path = [[C:\ProgramData\LuaRocks]]},
{name = [[local]], path = [[C:\Users\Thijs\AppData\Roaming\LuaRocks]]},
}
Somehow this seems more logical to me. But maybe I'm missing something.
Thijs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
