On 27 May 2014 14:43, Pierre Chapuis <catw...@archlinux.us> wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:28:06 -0300 > Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> wrote: > >> On 27 May 2014 14:13, leaf corcoran <lea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Right now you'll have to tell me and I'll transfer ownership for you. I'm >> > thinking of setting up a self service system that uses email > validation and >> > the email addresses provided in rockspec though. >> >> Unfortunately not that many rockspec have email information. Github >> use is so widespread that connecting accounts to its API would give >> most of the ownership information, but I suppose that would be a lot >> more work to pull off. >> >> Rough estimates: >> >> ls *.rockspec | sed 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*.rockspec.*//g' | sort -u | wc -l >> 377 >> >> grep @ *.rockspec | sed 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*.rockspec.*//g' | sort -u | wc -l >> 78 >> >> grep github *.rockspec | sed 's/-[^-]*-[^-]*.rockspec.*//g' | sort -u | > wc -l >> 236 > > Another issue will be users like me who have rocks > in both places but not necessarily the same versions. > > For instance fakeredis in MoonRocks is currently the > SCM version whereas the stable version is in LuaRocks.
In general, scm shouldn't go into the root repository. I've been controlling this by hand in the LR repo so far, uploading to /rocks/ and /rocks-scm/. -- Hisham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The best possible search technologies are now affordable for all companies. Download your FREE open source Enterprise Search Engine today! Our experts will assist you in its installation for $59/mo, no commitment. Test it for FREE on our Cloud platform anytime! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=145328191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
