On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 22:28, Sean Conner <s...@conman.org> wrote: > > It was thus said that the Great Hisham Muhammad once stated: > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for your reports and sorry about the bumpy road you're going > > through. > > > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 17:05, Sean Conner <s...@conman.org> wrote: > > > It was thus said that the Great Sean Conner once stated: > > > > * Remove all evidance that LuaRocks had been installed > > > > * Remove all evidance that LuaJIT had been installed > > > > * Remove all evidance that Lua had been install > > > > * Reinstall Lua > > > > * mkdir $HOME/.lurocks > > > > * reinstall previous config file there > > > > * ./configure LuaRocks > > > > * make bootstrap > > > > > > > > And it worked after all that. > > > > That shouldn't have all been necessary, I'm not sure what happened. > > One possibility is that you were trying to run it from within the > > luarocks tarball dir, which is itself a LuaRocks project, so it was > > picking that up and installing things into its own lua_modules dir > > (that's like running git from within a git repo, it will assume it is > > referring to that repo). > > That could very well be the problem, I don't know. > > > > [spc]lucy:~/projects/lua-conmanorg/rockspecs>luarocks upload > > > --api-key=<redacted> org.conman.errno-1.0.2-1.rockspec > > > Sending org.conman.errno-1.0.2-1.rockspec ... > > > > > > Error: '/usr/bin/curl' program not found. Make sure curl is installed and > > > is > > > available in your PATH (or you may want to edit the 'variables.CURL' value > > > in file '/home/spc/.luarocks/config-5.3.lua') > > > [spc]lucy:~/projects/lua-conmanorg/rockspecs>which curl > > > /usr/bin/curl > > > [spc]lucy:~/projects/lua-conmanorg/rockspecs> > > > > > > So I *have* curl installed, but LuaRocks is not finding it. > > > > This is very odd. Can you try running it with --verbose, to see if we > > get any hint? > > [spc]lucy:~/projects/lua-conmanorg/rockspecs>luarocks upload > org.conman.tls-1.0.0-1.rockspec > Sending org.conman.tls-1.0.0-1.rockspec ... > > Error: '/usr/bin/curl' program not found. Make sure curl is installed and is > available in your PATH (or you may want to edit the 'variables.CURL' value in > file '/home/spc/.luarocks/config-5.3.lua') > [spc]lucy:~/projects/lua-conmanorg/rockspecs>luarocks upload --verbose > org.conman.tls-1.0.0-1.rockspec > > io.popen: stat -c '%U' '/home/spc/.cache/luarocks' 2> /dev/null > Sending org.conman.tls-1.0.0-1.rockspec ... > > os.execute: '/usr/bin/curl' '--version' > curl 7.12.1 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.12.1 OpenSSL/0.9.7a > zlib/1.2.1.2 libidn/0.5.6 > Protocols: ftp gopher telnet dict ldap http file https ftps > Features: GSS-Negotiate IDN IPv6 Largefile NTLM SSL libz > Results: 3 > 1 (nil): nil > 2 (string): exit > 3 (number): 2
That is odd, curl --version returns exit code 2? On my machine running curl 7.53.1, I get a 0: hisham@proxy ~]curl --version curl 7.53.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.53.1 OpenSSL/1.x.x zlib/1.2.8 Protocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher http https imap imaps ldap ldaps pop3 pop3s rtsp smb smbs smtp smtps telnet tftp Features: IPv6 Largefile GSS-API Kerberos SPNEGO NTLM NTLM_WB SSL libz TLS-SRP UnixSockets HTTPS-proxy hisham@proxy ~]echo $? 0 I'm guessing I could anything other than a 127 to be a success, as in "the program does exist". Would it be possible for you to upgrade curl so we could confirm that it's a version issue? > Yes, I am running a rather older system, but it hasn't been much of an > issue. Indeed, curl detection (which is needed by `luarocks upload` when LuaSocket isn't installed) used to happen at configure-time scanning for $PATH, and now it shifted to probing the command at runtime. > > > Secondly, I used to be able to upload without the --api-key option, but > > > I'm having difficulty finding out how I got that working with that option. > > > > > > So far: > > > > > > * You can't upgrade to LuaRocks 3 from LuaRocks 2 using luarocks. > > > > That is indeed a limitation. This is a major release and the first > > rockspec format change in like 10(?) years, so I figured I'd make the > > jump and use the new features in its own rockspec as a showcase of the > > functionality. > > Can you not have a rockspec file for both versions? It would require some testing, but might be doable. I opted for going for a clean slate with LuaRocks 3 because it removes out-of-the-box support for unversioned trees (which were always problematic in the face of multiple Lua versions), and the `luarocks install luarocks` path would preserve that in people's machines. I should have pointed out that upgrade limitation more clearly in the announcement email. -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
