2009/9/23 Heiko Oberdiek <[email protected]>: > >> it says "Missing primitive name on l7". Is it normal ? > > Afaik yes.
Ok, so it should not be a primitive... >> This behaviour >> looks strange to me, as testprefixattribute should be a primitive... > > Yes, but that doesn't matter. Hmmm now you say that it should be one... I don't really understand... > it needs the original primitive name. > The purpose is, to get the primitive meaning, even if the command > is redefined later as macro or whatever, e.g. after > > \let\attribute\hbox > \pdfprimitive\attribute > > you get the original meaning of \attribute, not a \hbox. I know, but in TeXLive 2009, attribute does not exist for LaTeX (like other luatex-specific promitives), so you cannot say \pdfprimitive\attribute. What I wanted is to do the same with luatexattribute, which is the only "primitive" (I still don't know if it's one or not) available in TeXLive 2009 for LaTeX... It's not a really big issue as it seems strangefor people to do such a thing as \let\luatexattribute\hbox, but I report it in case it's a bug. Thank you, -- Elie
