On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Martin Schröder <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2010/12/16 stefano franchi <[email protected]>: > > Actually tlcontrib (which I had missed) sounds great. But the available > > luatex version > > is revision 20014. SVN snapshot I just compiled is a paltry (rev 4037). > Is > > Taco updating Tlcontrib from the future? > > luatex --credits > This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121523 (rev 4040) > This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121316 > > Now which one is newer? :-) > > So, with the --reinstall option of tlcontrib providing the security blanket, I had a go and installed the latest luatex onthe repository. This version came down the pipes: This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121316 which seems to be newer than what I compiled from SVN: stef...@polus:~/temp/luatex-devel/trunk$ build/texk/web2c/luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121512 (rev 4037) However, the tlcontrib version fails on the sample file and pdf I posted earlier with: <testpage.pdf, id=3, page=1, 614.295pt x 794.97pt> <use testpage.pdf, page 1> <use testpage.pdf, page 1> <use testpage.pdf, page 1> <use testpage.pdf, page 1> [1 <./testpage.pdf LuaTeX warning: PDF inclusion: /Resources missing. 'This practice is not recomm ended' (PDF Ref.) >] <testpage.pdf, id=11, page=2, 614.295pt x 794.97pt> <use testpage.pdf, page 2> <use testpage.pdf, page 2> <use testpage.pdf, page 2> [2 <./testpage.pdf LuaTeX warning: PDF inclusion: /Resources missing. 'This practice is not recomm ended' (PDF Ref.) Perhaps the tlcontrib version does not include the patch Hartmut provided? My apologies if that's a silly question. Cheers, Stefano > Best > Martin > >
