On 07/26/2011 12:45 PM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
But if you comment the \mathdir TRT, it behaves naturally.
I do not see how that excludes a \rotatebox bug. In fact, in your example, if you wrap an \fbox around the \rotatebox call, you can quite clearly see that \rotatebox has produced something with the wrong bounding box. I have no real knowledge of the internals of \rotatebox, but I assume it creates a new box with dimensions that are calculated using some goniometric mutation of the original box's dimensions. Looks like that code is not quite ready for use in bidi environments. The attached (smaller) test shows the same (wrong) bounding box, without article.cls, without multirow.sty, without tabular, and without math mode. Best wishes, Taco
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\luatextextdir TRT
\begin{document}
\fbox{\rotatebox{45}{test}}
\end{document}
