Hi, > I can't see why the devs didn't preserve the usual entries in > package.loaders, just pushing them a few indices forth.
My guess would be that TeX systems should live in their own world and not be system dependent. But that's just a wild guess. > Does anyone know a (practical, preferably portable) workaround? Put the modules in a texmf tree. But then you won't be happy because loading Lua modules is a game of luck with LuaTeX (on OS X at least). Unless you edit the build script and compile LuaTeX yourself. (Sorry to keep on about this - it's really a pity that this is the case with LuaTeX and I have no idea how to help here.) Patrick
