Dirk Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 23 februari 2012 15:39 heeft Ulrike Fischer <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > [For some reason my answer didn't appear on the list. So I'm > > reposting, sorry if the first message finally shows up.] > > > > Am Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:40:44 +0100 schrieb Ingo Krabbe: > > > >> Do you have some hints and to-be-reads to get started with unicode math > >> and plain TeX? > > By unicode math, I hope you don't mean the glyphs in u2190 to u22ff. > Donald Knuth did not invent TeX so that we should go back to character-based > math typesetting.
eh? i always type characters when i'm writing maths for processing with tex. what unicode does for us in this context is provide a huge range of character codes for things that were (perforce) in different 7-bit fonts when tex first appeared. remember that the membership of the iso committees that defined the character set included one barbara beeton, as fine a tex conservative as any i know. robin
