Le lundi 06 mai 2013 à 17:09 +0900, Dohyun Kim a écrit : > 2013/5/6 Jean <[email protected]>: > > Thank you for your help. I have downloaded your package, patched > > luatexko-mplib.sty and installed the two files into the directory > > .../texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luamplib > > that is, the same directory as luamplib.lua and luamplib.sty. > > But the compilation failed because of : > > ! LaTeX Error: File `luatexko-mplib.sty' not found. > > I have tried creating a > > .../texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexko-mplib > > directory and storing your two files into it, but the > > result is the same. Is there any missing step in the > > installation process? > > > > It seems that you did not run 'mktexlsr'. > > Anyway, I don't recommend putting these files under texmf-dist > directory. Above all they are for temporary or ad hoc solution. Why > don't you put those files in the working directory, the same place as > your tex source file? > Why didn't I put those files in the working directory? Because I did not think of it. Because I still lack familiarity with the tex-live directory architecture. Because I do not know if there is a tex-live equivalent to the shell's $PATH. Because of many other reasons. Summing up: because PEBKAC (not always, but unfortunately too often).
Anyhow, I tried with luaexko-mplib.* in the working directory and it works. Since these files are public domain as you said in http://tug.org/pipermail/lualatex-dev/2013-April/001504.html, does that mean that I can put them in a Github repo where I have a LuaLaTeX + MetaPost file? (Asking just to be sure). > Best, > -- > Dohyun Kim > Seoul, Republic of Korea Thank you, Jean Forget
