Am 29.04.2013 20:12, schrieb Stephan Hennig:
> Taco, is this change intentional? It hasn't been announced in the
> LuaTeX changelog. Do I have to adapt my code (the change breaks the
> spelling package) or will LuaTeX be fixed?
Ping!
Referring to field 'command' instead 'cmd' works. I could test for the
correct node field, but since node.has_field(n, 'cmd') returns true and
node.has_field(n, 'command') returns false with LuaTeX 0.76, one needed
to explicitly test for an error triggered by an assignment to either field.
\directlua{
local WHATSIT = node.id('whatsit')
local PDF_COLORSTACK = node.subtype('pdf_colorstack')
local function test_node_cmd()
local n = node.new(WHATSIT, PDF_COLORSTACK)
n.cmd = 1
end
if pcall(test_node_cmd) then
texio.write_nl('node.cmd')
else
texio.write_nl('node.command')
end
}
\bye
Do I need to add such an ugly test to my code or may we expect this to
be fixed before TL2013 is released?
Best regards,
Stephan Hennig
