On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Hans Hagen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/24/2015 12:26 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Op 23 mei 2015 om 13:04 heeft luigi scarso <[email protected]> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hm. >>> >>> $ luatex --fmt=luatex-plain --foo "test.tex" >>> luatex: unrecognized option '--foo' >>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.80.1 experimental >>> \write18 enabled. >>> (./test.tex >>> : >>> : >>> >>> >>> $ luatex --fmt=luatex-plain --lua=test.lua --foo "test.tex" >>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.80.1 experimental >>> \write18 enabled. >>> (./test.tex >>> : >>> : >>> (test.lua is empty) >>> >>> Perhaps we should explain this in the manual, >>> but in general I think it's not a good idea to suppress the message >>> "unrecognized option" . >>> >> >> This is working exactly as intended. Please do not change the behaviour. >> > > Indeed, so the two example runs can be added to the manual as with: > > When a lua script is specified there is will be no checking on > unrecognized options because the lua code itself can be driven by options. > > (As we do pass options to context it would mean that we'd get a whole list > of confusing unrecognized options.) > > Done in revision 5262.
-- luigi
